Sometime in the last month (when I wasn’t posting), comments got hosed on the blog. A few short minutes with our best friend Google, and an obscure option has been changed to allow comments again. Can’t explain why they were working before and no changes were made, and I’m not sure what effect this will have on the hundreds of spam comments per week that I receive — hopefully they won’t trickle into the blog.
Sorry if this caused you any consternation or inconvenience. Most of you comment directly to me anyway ![]()
Matthew tagged me, asking for details beyond the surface. It sounds like a chain letter, but I enjoy reading the posts of folks I know (a lot more than I enjoy writing this), so I’ll play along.
Five things you didn’t know about me:
This exercise has caused me to notice that almost almost none of my (personal) friends blog. Which leaves me a little short in the tag department. But I’ll reach out and tag Jeff, Joe, Andy, and Matthew. And soon, Wyck (dad) — when I show him how to do it.
Start blogging!
Evidently some mass spammer has figured out how to defeat the mechanisms in place to post completely idiotic and what I consider to be rather offensive comments to my blog. While I am not the author and don’t condone, approve, or appreciate these selected comments (I LOVE the discussion comments, and wonder why there aren’t more of them — I get more comments directly to me in email that are posted to the blog. Whatever.), because they are on my web site, I am in some way responsible. I have deleted these offensive posts (and left all the others), and taken more aggressive action against such things in the future. This means that if you use some slightly marginal words (I won’t list them here :-)) they get sent to a queue for me to approve rather than directly posting. I’ve been deleting a half dozen or more per day of these for some time now, and hopefully these measures will protect the reading public a little more.
Rest assured I will not delete real comments that add value to a discussion (or are even about the discussion, but random comments about human physical behavior do not apply, methinks).
Thanks for reading, and again, sorry if you had to catch an eyeful of that *%!@.
If you publish it, you’re responsible for it.
If you’ve got things left to do this year, now would be a great time to do them. In fact, there’s no better time.
It’s a peculiar time — the end of the year and the beginning of the year. But this is the cyclical nature of life. As you end one job, you begin another. As you end a relationship, others wait in the wings. If you finish a book, the next thing you read is starting another. If you tie up a conversation, you’ll speak again to start another.
I draw great comfort from this little mental exercise. I’m so glad we can start anew. I’m glad all my conversations are not continuations of those miserable effotrs I’ve made. I’m glad that prior mistakes can be corrected. I’m thrilled that not everyone will have the same input into my life again this year — it’s all new, exciting, and filled with possibilities.
Happy New Year. May 2006 be your best yet.
An ending is the next beginning. Start strong in 2006 (and in all your communication efforts!).
Back to our friend’s sales call earlier in the week…
This person had clearly not analyzed the audience. He didn’t know even how to pronouce the company’s name, had no idea what sort of activity the people in the room actually did, and proceeded to present with confidence to topics that were marginally offensive.
A comment was made that “All XYZ is junk.” Bet he’d have liked to have known that one of the people in the room had authorized $1M for an XYZ solution this year. Oops.
A sample product (not sure it was even his company’s) was passed out with nearly offensive pictures on the cover (target audience of the sample product was supposed/presumed to be young males). The group in the room was 33% female, the company is right at 50% female, and average age around 40. The comment, “I’ll bet this looks just like your work force here…” was downright uncalled for and sent credibility to zero.
He demoed several application/solutions that were a little out of the box. Nothing inherently wrong with that, but none of them were related to the problems the folks who were watching faced, and if similar things were deployed, I know for a fact the CEO would have fired people on the spot had he seen it. One phone call, 15 minutes of Googling, and a conversation starter instead of the canned “introduce yourself…” beginning could have circumvented all that, and the sales call could very well have had a decidedly different (and six-figure) outcome.
One simple rule to live by:
Know your audience, and meet their needs.
This will be a place to add tips and tricks, to log all the thoughts and observations on what works and what doesn’t in presenting content. Come on in and enjoy. Come back and enjoy some more…
[powered by WordPress.]
Send comments or problems to MillsWyck Web Admin.
A collection of thoughts, impressions, tips, ideas, and observations from the Director of MillsWyck Communications, Alan Hoffler.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Time is the one commodity where everyone has equal amounts... Spend yours wisely.
29 queries. 1.019 seconds